Sep 29, 2024: The case against restarting Three Mile Island’s Unit-1


Radioactive: The Women of Three Mile Island

Did you catch "The Meltdown: Three Mile Island" on Netflix?
TMI remains a danger and TMIA is working hard to ensure the safety of our communities and the surrounding areas.
Learn more on this site and support our efforts. Join TMIA. To contact the TMIA office, call 717-233-7897.

    

Oct 16, 2024

by Darrell Proctor

The power generation sector is looking at numerous ways to provide enough electricity to satisfy demand from data centers. Bloomberg Intelligence recently said its research shows data centers, buildings filled with servers and other computing equipment for data storage and networking that supports operations and artificial intelligence (AI), could be responsible for as much as 17% of all U.S. electricity consumption by 2030. The U.S. Dept. of Energy (DOE) has said one data center can require 50 times the electricity of a typical office building.

Several technology groups are looking at nuclear powerincluding the use of small modular reactors (SMRs), to meet their electricity needs. Energy analysts have said natural gas, whether burned in large-scale facilities or peaker plants, also will be important.

Power consumption from data centers, though, also is benefiting coal-fired power plants, some of which may be kept running longer than expected in order to meet the increased demand for electricity from companies such as Google, Meta, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and others. Some coal-fired plants already have gotten a reprieve in areas where more energy is needed as data centers come online, or are in the planning stages.

The topic reportedly was discussed when C-suite executives from Alphabet (Google), AWS, Microsoft, Meta, Nvidia, and OpenAI met with government officials in Washington, D.C., last month to discuss ways to support U.S. infrastructure for AI, including data centers. Part of the discussion was about repurposing old coal sites as data center campuses. The DOE has said it will share resources with data center developers about how to repurpose former coal mines, or coal-fired power plants, to be home to data centers. Energy DELTA Lab, a collaborative effort that includes Dominion Energy Virginia and Appalachian Power, already is working on the Data Center Ridge project at a former mining site in Wise County, Virginia.

Life Extension

Maksim Sonin, an energy expert who has collaborated with several companies, including Chevron and Shell, and is a Sloan Fellow at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business, said, “Driven by recent trends in AI development, projected power consumption by data centers in the U.S. is expected to increase in the range from 8% to 17% by 2030—or potentially even higher, as progress in AI technologies is not linear but exponential, as seen in Silicon Valley today.” Sonin told POWER, “With this sharp upward trend, it is highly likely that coal-fired power plants will remain a part of the U.S. energy system for longer, although their role is expected to diminish,” as more renewable and other energy resources come online.

“Coal plants will have an extension of their life due to data center demand,” said Tim Echols, a commissioner and vice-chair of the Georgia Public Service Commission. Echols’ home state is actively recruiting data centers and manufacturing facilities to provide jobs and boost local economies. It already added a significant new source of power when two nuclear reactors entered service at Plant Vogtle last year and this year, providing about 2,200 MW of new electricity output in the state. Plant Vogtle, where two other reactors have operated since the 1980s, is now the nation’s largest nuclear power plant, with more than 4,600 MW of generation capacity.

Echols told POWER in an Oct. 16 interview that Georgia is preparing for a large increase in power demand. “There could be a massive increase of capacity approved next year. Data centers will account for most of it,” he said.

How to satisfy data center power demand is being discussed by utilities and energy officials nationwide. Allan Schurr, chief commercial officer with Texas-based Enchanted Rock, which provides microgrid backup power solutions to data centers and other critical infrastructure, said the debate also should include onsite generation.

“AI data centers require more generating capacity—that’s a given,” said Schurr. “While we are waiting for nuclear power to bring substantial additional baseload to the grid, we don’t want to needlessly ‘recarbonize’ our energy resources by extending the life of older, less-efficient fossil generation plants like coal.

Schurr told POWER, “Today’s grid has significant available capacity with the exception of about 500 hours per year that can be mitigated with dispatchable generation. And the grid needs those 500 hours of additional capacity so we can continue to add solar and wind resources into the energy mix. Data centers can facilitate this dispatchable generation from their own onsite generation, making them assets to the grid instead of liabilities.”

The utilities and grid operators arguing to keep coal-fired plants online say it makes sense to keep existing baseload power sources operating, at least until more nuclear or renewable energy is available. That’s why states including Nebraska, Virginia, and Utah among others, have plans to keep coal-fired units running to support the supply of electricity.

Virginia is World Data Center Leader

DC Byte, a UK-based research group that tracks data centers worldwide, has said the U.S. is the world leader in the buildout of data centers. The group said Virginia—home to about half of all U.S. data centers—is the largest data center market worldwide. Loudoun County in Virginia is known as “Data Center Alley.”

PJM Interconnection, the grid operator that serves Virginia, the District of Columbia, and 12 other states, has conceded some coal-fired power plants will need to continue operating, and miles of new transmission lines must be built, to satisfy ever-increasing demand for electricity. Other power sources will help—Japan’s Sumitomo Corp. on Tuesday announced it will partner with CEP Solar (based in Richmond, Virginia) to add 1.5 GW of solar and battery energy storage to support data center growth in the region.

“The system is in a major transition right now, and it’s going to continue to evolve,” Ken Seiler, PJM’s senior vice president in charge of planning, said in a December stakeholders’ meeting about how the grid operator can supply more power as it waits for more renewable energy resources to come online. “And we’ll look for opportunities to do everything we can to keep the lights on as it goes through this transition.”

DC Byte in its 2024 Global Data Center Index wrote, “Virginia currently has over 6 GW in the development pipeline including projects under active construction as well as Committed and Early Stage campuses.” The group noted, “Cloud is the greatest driver of growth in Virginia. AWS [Amazon Web Services] operates over 40 facilities in the state and Microsoft operates a massive campus in Boydton as well as a smaller facility in Loudoun County. Both companies have more self-build campuses in the pipeline and are also major colocation tenants across the market.”

DC Byte added, “In 2022, Loudoun County’s primary power supplier Dominion Energy announced that it would not be able to meet power demand in the market. Delays in power delivery are expected until 2025 or 2026 while new power infrastructure is built. In the meantime, Dominion Energy would be providing power incrementally.” Dominion officials have said they project that power demand in the utility’s territory will increase by 85% over the next 15 years.

The 1,100-MW Fort Martin Power Station is located in Maidsville, West Virginia, on the Monongahela River. It has two coal-fired units. It is owned by Monongahela Power (Mon Power), part of FirstEnergy Corp. Source: Mon PowerThe 1,100-MW Fort Martin Power Station is located in Maidsville, West Virginia, on the Monongahela River. It has two coal-fired units. It is owned by Monongahela Power (Mon Power), part of FirstEnergy Corp. Source: Mon Power

PJM is backing a $5.2 billion plan for new transmission lines across several states to bring power to Virginia. The lines would carry electricity produced at several coal-fired power plants that have been slated for closure, including the Longview, Fort Martin, and Harrison stations in West Virginia.

In Maryland, meanwhile, PJM has asked Texas-based Talen Energy Corp. to keep Brandon Shores and Herbert A. Wagner—two other coal-fired facilities located near Baltimore—online at least through 2028. The plants had been scheduled to close by June 2025.

Operating Extension for Omaha Coal Plant

The 644-MW North Omaha Station in Nebraska was scheduled to close in 2023. Instead, Google and Meta data centers caused the area’s power demand to spike, which led the Omaha Public Power District to decide that the two coal-fired units at North Omaha were needed to maintain reliability of the local power grid. The utility has said it will keep the coal-burning units online at least through 2026.

One Google data center is in Papillon, a town about 12 miles southwest of Omaha. DC Byte said the Google facility uses more power than the Meta office, and added that its data shows Google uses more electricity in Nebraska than it uses elsewhere in the U.S. The company also is planning more data centers in the state.

Data from Meta and other groups shows that the company’s data center in Sarpy County, about 25 miles southwest of Omaha, last year used almost as much power as the North Omaha station produced. The Meta campus includes nine separate complexes, encompassing about 4 million square feet.

The Omaha Public Power District has estimated that as much as two-thirds of the projected growth in power demand around Omaha will come from data centers, which are being built on what used to be farmland. Local officials have said opposition to wind and solar farms in rural areas has curtailed additional renewable energy resources that could supply power. The utility has been developing a 2,800-acre solar power project in rural York County, about 100 miles from Omaha, but area residents have voiced concerns about the installation. The utility also has said regulatory issues have slowed plans to replace coal-fired generation with natural gas-fired units.

Meta’s presence in Omaha was sought by state and local officials; a special electricity rate for industrial customers was created in 2017. That rate was then marketed to Google to entice the search engine giant to build in the area.

Georgia Courting Data Center Operators

Georgia Power is buying electricity from a sister company, Mississippi Power (both are part of Southern Co.), to help meet power demand in Georgia. The deal came after Georgia Power officials reportedly told state regulators that growing demand for electricity would overrun supply by year-end 2025. Georgia officials have been actively looking to bring data centers and manufacturing plants to that state, and Gov. Brian Kemp earlier this year vetoed a bill that would have suspended a tax break for data centers (the bill had bipartisan opposition). Had the bill become law, the tax break would have been under the review of a special commission on data center energy planning.

Kemp in a statement said, “The bill’s language would prevent the issuance of exemption certificates after an abrupt July 1, 2024 deadline for many customers of projects that are already in development—undermining the investments made by high-technology data center operators, customers, and other stakeholders in reliance on the recent extension, and inhibiting important infrastructure and job development.”

Georgia Power has a deal with Mississippi Power to buy 750 MW of electricity through 2028. Mississippi Power is providing the energy from its Victor J. Daniel Electric Generating Plant, better known as Plant Daniel, where two coal-fired units have operated for the past 50 years. The plant also has two natural gas combined-cycle units. It is the state’s largest power plant, with nearly 1.6 GW of generation capacity, including 500 MW from its two coal-fired units.

Mississippi Power had planned to retire the coal-burning steam turbines in 2027. The deal with Georgia Power, though, could extend that lifecycle. Jeffrey Grubb, the utility’s director of resource planning, reportedly was asked by Georgia Power’s lawyers about the agreement, and said, “Because those units would have been either retired or sold off-system and we needed certainty that they would be there to serve our customers.”

Echols, the PUC co-chair, on Wednesday told POWER the contract with Mississippi Power is open to any kind of generation source.

“Our contract with Mississippi Power calls for 750 MW, and it doesn’t matter where it comes from. That may mean an [operating] extension for the coal plant, or it may not,” he said. “Mississippi could do 750 MW of solar plus storage, they could bring in 750 MW of wind power from a neighboring state.”

Echols noted that a move by regulators in 2022 extended operations for two coal-fired units at Georgia Power’s Plant Bowen, one of the nation’s largest coal-burning power plants, with about 3.4 GW of generation capacity. Echols said, “In the 2022 IRP [integrated resource plan] … our commissioners delayed the closure of units 1 and 2 at Plant Bowen. I imagine as we evaluate that in next year’s IRP, we will also delay the closure for another three years. We’ll have to wait and see what the utility is asking for and how the commissioners feel we need to move forward.”

Echols told POWER, “There could be a massive increase of capacity approved next year. Data centers will account for most of it.” Echols also offered, “I think there is a scenario where we approve two more AP1000 [reactors] at Plant Vogtle if the federal government provides bankruptcy insurance or overrun insurance” for another expansion at the site.

Other Efforts

DC Byte has identified Salt Lake City, Utah, as a growing market for data centers. Meta already operates a 4.5-million-square foot complex in Eagle Mountain, Utah, south of Salt Lake City.

State lawmakers have pushed legislation to keep the Intermountain Power Project, a coal-fired station near Delta, Utah, open past the facility’s scheduled 2025 closure date. Officials have looked at ways to have the state take over the plant. Lawmakers this year did pass legislation intended to extend the life of Rocky Mountain Power’s coal-fired stations in Emery County.

Stuart Adams, president of the Utah Senate, during the legislative session this summer said, “The United States has a real problem. We do not have enough power for our data centers. AI development is technology that we have to embrace, and power is the key to it.”

Building more infrastructure to support that AI development was among the reasons those tech company execs met last month on Capitol Hill. Reports said the discussion included repurposing former coal sites to house data center campuses, in part because those sites usually have access to power lines, water, and a local workforce.

The DOE’s Pacific Northwest National Lab, which is leading the “coal-to-X” redevelopment campaign, in a guide to the program wrote, “A retired coal site could even be redeveloped to combine a data center with new clean energy on the same site.”

As Schurr of Enchanted Rock noted, generating onsite power via a microgrid, or through a renewable energy resource, could be preferable to using coal-fired generation. That’s of particular importance for data center operators looking to build in remote areas where they need plenty of land, and where there’s a lack of transmission infrastructure.

Sonin reiterated that coal will play a role in satisfying power demand from data centers, but like Schurr, noted other fuels could work with coal to reduce the environmental impact of keeping coal-fired power plants online.

Sonin told POWER, “Emerging technologies that, for instance, allow for substituting some of the coal with ammonia, a carbon-free hydrogen derivative, through a process known as co-firing, may help address public environmental concerns. Current advancements, particularly the potential for upscaling production trains, could reduce the cost of ammonia facilities by 30% and more, making this chemical a viable solution for cutting emissions from coal plants.”

Darrell Proctor is a senior editor for POWER

 

Tim Judson

Executive Director

Nuclear Information and Resource Service

6930 Carroll Avenue, Suite 340

Takoma Park, MD  20912

Pronouns: he/him/his

O: 301-270-6477

E: timj@nirs.org

W: www.nirs.org

USA, Pennsylvania: Constellation Energy has ordered a main power transformer for the Three Mile Island nuclear reactor in Pennsylvania. The company is attempting to restart the reactor, pushing ahead with work critical to the plant’s revival.

The transformer will be the biggest single piece of equipment which will need to be replaced for restart of the plant, and it will cost about $100 million. The owner of the plant Constellation is investing $1.6 billion to revive the operation over the next four years.

When deciding whether to move forward with a restart, Constellation surveyed the site to determine the condition of essential infrastructure and equipment, much of which has sat idle since the plant shut in 2019. Constellation Vice President of Generation Bryan Hanson said that the plant is in great condition.

Constellation signed a 20-year power contract with Microsoft to help restart the plant. The nuclear reactor, located on an island in the Susquehanna River in Pennsylvania, could supply 835 MW of power to offset Microsoft’s data center electricity consumption.

No modern US nuclear power plant has been restarted after fully shutting down. Three Mile Island is known as the site of the worst nuclear power accident in US history, as in 1979, a unit experienced a partial meltdown which caused no deaths but released small amounts of radioactive gases and raised concerns about the potential health effects on surrounding communities. That unit will not be restarted.

Separate Unit 1, which Constellation wants to resurrect, shut in 2019 for economic reasons. Unit 1 could begin producing power in 2028, but there is a series of physical hurdles and US and local regulations that must be completed first. Among other investments in resuming operations at the plant are work on the reactor’s turbine, generator, and cooling systems.

Source: Reuters

Dear No Nuke Community,
 
Please show up this Friday 10/25 at 9:00am ET.  Registration required - Please share
The purpose for the meeting is for the Constellation Energy Generation, LLC to provide an overview of their plan to potentially restart Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1, as well as to rename the facility to Crane Clean Energy Center. This is a Hybrid Meeting.
 
Teleconference:
Bridge Number Conference        ID Pass Code
(301) 576-2978                           759137601#
 
 
Meeting Number 
250 970 214 041
 
Password
6JBzJV
 
This meeting will be hybrid. Please register in advance of the meeting by clicking on the
provided link. This will take you to a new page where you will be asked to provide some
basic information, including an email address, so that the system can send you the
Microsoft Teams link for the meeting. We ask that you do this in advance (at least 30
minutes) to provide the system time to send the link before the meeting starts.
 

10/25/24
9:00AM -
11:00AM ET
 
 
Meeting info
The purpose for the meeting is for the Constellation Energy Generation, LLC
to provide an overview of their plan to potentially restart Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1,
as well as to rename the facility to Crane Clean Energy Center. This is a Hybrid Meeting. [more...]

Participation: Observation

Teleconference
 
 
One White Flint
11555 Rockville Pike
O-8B4
Rockville MD
 
 
Justin Poole
(301) 415-2048

Ngola Otto
(301) 415-6695
 
 
N2
Michael J. Keegan
Don't Waste Michigan
 The site of the worst nuclear accident in U.S. history is poised to get a rebranding
  • Updated: Oct. 18, 2024, 5:11 a.m.
  • |Published: Oct. 18, 2024, 5:10 a.m.
 
Constellation Energy has reached an agreement with Microsoft to launch the Crane Clean Energy Center and restart Three Mile Island Unit 1 back to service and online producing electricity in 2028. October 16, 2024. Dan Gleiter | dgleiter@pennlive.comDan Gleiter | dgleiter@pennlive.com
 
By 
Some of the most recognizable U.S. companies have changed their names over the years for a variety of reasons:
Facebook changed to Meta to reflect its focus on creating a metaverse.
 
Campbell Soup Company switched to The Campbell’s Company to reflect its wider selection of products.
Dunkin’ Donuts went simply to Dunkin’ to modernize its brand.
 
Now Constellation Energy wants to change the name of Three Mile Island Nuclear Station.
 
After all, who wouldn’t want to bury the name attached to the worst nuclear disaster on American soil?
But Constellation’s chief generation officer Bryan Hanson denied that’s the reason the company wants to adopt a new name: Crane Clean Energy Center.
 
The company, which owns the shuttered nuclear plant, plans to bring the proposal before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for approval on Oct. 25, along with an overview of the plans to restart the nuclear reactor.
 
Three Mile Island Unit 1 to go online in 2028
 
“Crane” is a tribute to Chris Crane, the CEO of Constellation’s former parent company who died in April after distinguishing himself as a leader in nuclear energy.
 
“We’re recognizing a titan of the nuclear industry that established high standards for not only the U.S. but the world to operate these nuclear plants,” Hanson said.
 
“We’re dedicating this plant in his name because fundamentally we expect to do the same with this plant – restore it to as good as it was when we shut it down, to establish the high levels of reliability and standards that it operated to, and operate [it] for the next 20 plus years. That’s important to us.”
 
As for including “clean energy” in the proposed name, he said this plant will produce massive amounts of electricity without carbon emissions and at a level of reliability independent of the weather, the sun or pipelines.
 
“There’s no other industry that makes electricity that can account for every gram of waste and account for it both responsibly and financially like we do,” Hanson said. “We’re very confident in our ability to say clean energy.”
 
Nuclear energy watchdog Eric Epstein has a hard time accepting that rationale.
 
“What is ‘clean’ about radioactive waste? You can call TMI whatever you want, but the fact remains that it is a radioactive garbage dump,” he said. “The priority should be cleaning up Three Mile Island, rather than rebranding a nuclear waste site.”
 
Marketing expert Bo Bothe, president and CEO of BrandExtract of Houston, Texas, said he can’t blame Constellation for seeking a new name for the plant.
 
“This site has been branded as a failure for America and a danger for so long that you’ve got to overcome that somehow,” he said.
However, changing the name alone isn’t enough to change someone’s perception of the plant or any brand for that matter —that takes time and money, Bothe said.
 
Three Mile Island carries a lot of baggage with residents in central Pennsylvania, who are haunted by the trauma of the partial meltdown 45 years ago when 100,000 people were forced to flee.
 
Changing perceptions also requires working with the community, communication, safety assurances, and living up to its promises for the new brand to take hold, he said.
 
Constellation is seeking the NRC’s approval to bring Unit 1 back online by 2028, that would be nine years after the plant was shut down amid financial woes. Microsoft entered into a 20-year agreement with Constellation to buy all the zero-emission energy the plant produces to help meet the tech company’s pledge of becoming carbon negative by 2030.
 
Bothe said given Microsoft’s carbon reduction pledge, it’s understandable Constellation wants clean energy in the name. Naming the plant after a person known for helping to shape the nuclear energy also is understandable.
 
But he added, “The challenge is this site has already been branded and how do you change that perception. It’s pretty risky for Microsoft to have an association there because if there is a failure, it really will affect Microsoft’s brand. Hopefully, they’ve taken all that into account and not just think oh, this would be cheaper to redo a plant” than build new.
 
Hanson said Constellation’s request to change the plant’s name isn’t an effort to erase the plant’s history.
 
Rather, he said, “I’m hoping to move past it and recognize it for what it was and what it did for the industry to create such high level performance across not only our nation but the world. If you think about where nuclear has come from since that accident in ’79, no one can argue that we haven’t learned the lessons, that we have better operator training, that we have better reliability, better oversight, the whole soup to nuts.
 
“Nuclear is in a much stronger position than in ’79.”
 
THREE MILE ISLAND RESTART
SUBJECT:  Notice of Meeting with Constellation Energy Generation, LLC
 
ADAMS Accession No. ML24289A126
 Using Web-based ADAMS, select “Advanced Search”
Under “Property,” select “Accession Number”
Under “Value,” enter the Accession Number
Click Search

Amazon and Energy Northwest announce plans to develop advanced nuclear technology in Washington

10/16/2024
News Release
 

RICHLAND, Wash. – Amazon (Nasdaq; AMZN) and Energy Northwest, a public power agency leading in the development of next-generation nuclear technologies, today announced an agreement to fund efforts to move toward development and deployment of small modular reactor (SMR) technology in Washington state to advance reliable energy across the Northwest.

As the demand for energy resources continue to rise, Energy Northwest and Amazon recognize the urgent need to develop advanced technologies in the Pacific Northwest that provide reliable, carbon-free and sustainable energy generation. SMRs offer a promising solution to that need through scalable and flexible energy output.

Through the agreement, Amazon will fund the initial feasibility phase of an SMR project, which is planned to be sited near Energy Northwest's Columbia Generating Station nuclear energy facility in Richland, Washington.

“As a member of Washington's business community, Amazon is committed to investing in new nuclear energy technologies that can help power our operations and provide net-new, safe sources of carbon-free energy to the grid," said Kevin Miller, Amazon's Vice President of Global Data Centers. “We're proud to be working with Energy Northwest, a utility company that's also thinking big about meeting society's growing energy demands while addressing climate change. This new SMR project is a significant step toward Amazon's Climate Pledge commitment to reach net-zero carbon across our operations by 2040, and signifies our continued dedication to becoming a more sustainable company."

“We are excited about this collaboration with Amazon and are impressed with their vision for helping develop new nuclear technologies and their desire to also make this resource available to utilities in the future," said Greg Cullen, Vice President for Energy Services & Development at Energy Northwest. “We've been working for years to develop this project at the urging of our members, and have found that taking this first, bold step is difficult for utilities, especially those that provide electricity to ratepayers at the cost of production. We applaud Amazon for being willing to use their financial strength, need for power and know-how to lead the way to a reliable, carbon-free power future for the region."

The SMRs will be the Xe-100 design, a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor developed by X-energy, a global leader in advanced nuclear reactor and fuel technology. Each Xe-100 module can provide 80 megawatts of full-time electricity. Energy Northwest and X-energy have engaged extensively on plans for an Xe-100 facility since 2020.
Under the agreement, Amazon will have the right to purchase electricity from the first project (four modules), which is expected to generate 320 megawatts (MW) of energy capacity. Energy Northwest has the option to further build out the site by adding up to eight additional modules (640 MWs) resulting in a total project generating capacity of up to 960 MWs. This additional power will be available to Amazon and northwest utilities to power homes and businesses.

As the owner and operator of Columbia Generating Station, the Pacifi​c Northwest's only nuclear generating facility, and as a developer and operator of additional clean energy and storage resources, Energy Northwest is well-equipped to develop this project.

This collaboration between Energy Northwest and Amazon demonstrates the power of public-private partnerships in driving innovation and accelerating the progression of sustainable energy solutions. It also paves the way for public power entities to develop and build future SMRs to help meet the region's growing energy demands.

Amazon press release

X-energy press release 

Media Kit 
 
Additional Attributable Quotes

"One of the greatest concerns for community-owned electric utilities is having access to reliable sources of electricity that fulfill carbon-free energy mandates. Advanced nuclear fits the bill. This bold partnership between Energy Northwest and Amazon will help pave the way for additional nuclear development in our region and represents a critical step toward achieving a clean and dependable electric grid."
-Kurt Miller, Executive Director, Northwest Public Power Association
---------

“It is essential that American energy, American technology and American innovation continues to set the standard for the rest of the world. Our community is poised to become the center of that innovation, for everything from information, energy and agricultural technologies. These opportunities will positively shape the future of our nation, our state and our families' lives. 

However, without the electricity to attract industry and grow our communities, our collective goals will never be realized. Investments like these, where end-users, government and industry step up to the plate and help build the critical infrastructure that will propel us all into the future is an investment that cannot be understated. 

The Central Washington Building Trades Unions have worked tirelessly to grow and train the skilled workforce of the next generation. The future of our community will be built by talented Building Trades Union members and their families that live here.

The way I see it we must have two things, the people to build the future and the energy to power it. The Central Washington Building Trades is committed to supply the next generation of skilled crafts to build the future and this investment represents an important commitment to power it."
-Nickolas A. Bumpaous, President Central Washington Building Trades and Business Manager for UA Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union 598
---------

“The Pacific Northwest region will need a remarkable amount of electricity to meet a projected increase in demand due to data center development, high-tech manufacturing growth and the continued trend toward electrification. At the same time, the region is on a path to reducing carbon emissions to address the disastrous effects of climate change. The path must include many solutions, like dependable generation that can back-up variable wind and solar power resources to assure an adequate, reliable power supply. Energy Northwest's pro-active decision making and partnership with Amazon makes substantial progress toward modernizing and decarbonizing the region's power system."
-Crystal Ball, Executive Director Pacific Northwest Utilities Conference Committee
---------

"Amazon's announced investment in small modular reactors gives me hope for the future of the Northwest power grid. Under 100% non-emitting electricity requirements, nuclear power is the only technology capable of reliably delivering the massive amounts of around-the-clock energy our society needs, while also positioning utilities to meet aggressive electrification goals. I am ecstatic and deeply grateful to Amazon for their bold and visionary leadership."
-Rick Dunn, General Manager, Benton Public Utility District

Media contacts:

Energy Northwest:

Kelly Rae

Corporate Communications

klrae@energy-northwest.com

 

Amazon:

Erika Reynoso

Corporate Communications

ermreyno@amazon.com
 

About Energy Northwest       
Energy Northwest is a Washington state public power joint operating agency and a premier provider of carbon-free electricity. Energy Northwest comprises 29 public power member utilities, serving more than 1.5 million customers, and provides its members and regional customers with safe, reliable, cost-effective, responsible power generation and innovative energy and business solutions. The agency owns and operates hydroelectric, solar, battery storage, wind and the Northwest's only nuclear power facility. Energy Northwest also actively supports transportation electrification and new generation projects to the benefit of public power. www.energy-northwest.com.        

About Amazon
Amazon is guided by four principles: customer obsession rather than competitor focus, passion for invention, commitment to operational excellence, and long-term thinking. Amazon strives to be Earth's Most Customer-Centric Company, Earth's Best Employer, and Earth's Safest Place to Work. Customer reviews, 1-Click shopping, personalized recommendations, Prime, Fulfillment by Amazon, AWS, Kindle Direct Publishing, Kindle, Career Choice, Fire tablets, Fire TV, Amazon Echo, Alexa, Just Walk Out technology, Amazon Studios, and The Climate Pledge are some of the things pioneered by Amazon. For more information, visit amazon.com/about and follow @AmazonNews.​

Google inks nuclear deal for next-generation reactors

Google has signed a first-of-its-kind deal to purchase nuclear energy for its data centers
 
By Justine Calma, a senior science reporter covering energy and the environment with more than a decade of experience. She is also the host of Hell or High Water: When Disaster Hits Home, a podcast from Vox Media and Audible Originals.
 
Oct 15, 2024, 9:39 PM GMT+8
 
 
Google logo and black swirls
Illustration: The Verge

 

Google plans to buy electricity from next-generation nuclear reactors. It announced the deal yesterday, which it says is the world’s first corporate agreement to purchase electricity from advanced small modular reactors (SMRs) that are still under development.

Google inked the deal with engineering company Kairos Power, which plans to get its first SMR up and running by 2030. Google agreed to purchase electricity from “multiple” reactors that would be built through 2035.

Google needs a lot more clean energy to meet its climate goals while pursuing its AI ambitions. New nuclear technologies are still unproven at scale, but the hope is that they can provide carbon pollution-free electricity while solving some of the problems that come with traditional nuclear power plants.

Back in 2020, Google set a goal of running on carbon-free energy around the clock by 2030. It also committed to slashing its planet-heating pollution in half by 2030 compared to a 2019 baseline. And yet, since 2019, its total greenhouse gas emissions have grown by 48 percent, according to its latest environmental report.

“Obviously, the trajectory of AI investments has added to the scale of the task needed,” CEO Sundar Pichai said in an interview with Nikkei earlier this month. “We are now looking at additional investments, be it solar, and evaluating technologies like small modular nuclear reactors, etc.”

Other big tech companies with climate goals are trying to solve the same problem with nuclear energy. In March, Amazon Web Services announced its purchase of a data center campus powered by a nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania. Microsoft signed an agreement in September to help revive and purchase power from the shuttered Three Mile Island plant. 

What sets Google apart with this deal is that it’s turning to next-generation reactors rather than traditional nuclear power plants. SMRs are roughly one-tenth to one-quarter the size in comparison. Their size and modular design are supposed to make them cheaper and easier to build and site than their larger predecessors. And unlike solar and wind energy, which fluctuate with the weather and time of day, nuclear power plants can generate electricity around the clock. Even with new reactor designs, however, there are still environmental and health concerns when it comes to mining and enriching uranium for reactors and storing radioactive waste.

The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission certified a design for a small modular reactor for the first time last year. Experts tell The Verge they expect the first SMRs to connect to US power grids in the early 2030s at the earliest, and big tech’s interest in nuclear energy seems to be giving the industry a boost.

Google says its deal with Kairos Power would eventually help bring up to 500MW of carbon-free energy to power grids in the US. Kairos broke ground on its first demonstration reactor in Tennessee in July.

“Having an agreement for multiple deployments is important to accelerate the commercialization of advanced nuclear energy by demonstrating the technical and market viability,” Jeff Olson, Kairos Power vice president of business development and finance, said in a press release.


Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost in 2019.
 
 
By Kathiann M. Kowalski
 

The Ohio Attorney General’s office wants to keep information it produced in a state criminal case from going to plaintiffs in federal shareholder litigation. State lawyers also want to limit what former FirstEnergy executives Chuck Jones and Michael Dowling – who are defendants in both cases – can ask various witnesses in the shareholder proceeding.

The move to limit evidence is among the latest developments in Ohio’s ongoing corruption scandal surrounding the state’s 2019 nuclear and coal bailout law, House Bill 6. Other recent news includes: 

The Securities and Exchange Commission agreed to settle claims against FirstEnergy for $100 million, but filed a separate court case against former CEO, Chuck Jones, for alleged securities law violations.
Ohio regulators limited evidence from challengers’ experts in one of four HB 6-related cases last week, while letting a FirstEnergy witness testify about issues challengers said were beyond the scope of the hearing.
An audit report in another of the regulatory cases found FirstEnergy allocated only a small share of its spending on the HB 6 bribery scheme to Ohio utilities, and concluded there was little or no impact on customers.
HB 6 is an issue in at least one Ohio congressional campaign this fall, while a new report reviews FirstEnergy’s work to secure federal bailouts when Donald Trump was president.

State seeks to limit fact-finding

The Office of the Ohio Attorney General has gotten involved in ongoing shareholder litigation related to HB 6. An October 10 filing seeks to pause the disclosure of materials it turned over to former FirstEnergy executives Chuck Jones and Michael Dowling in the state criminal case against them. The motion also asks the court to block their depositions — questioning under oath — of several witnesses the state plans to call in the criminal case.

Stays of this nature in civil proceedings pending criminal prosecutions are not automatic. Among other things, courts typically weigh whether ongoing civil proceedings will impair defendants’ constitutional right against self-incrimination or otherwise hinder their ability to prepare a defense against the government’s criminal charges. 

The motion says Jones’ lawyer agrees that sharing discovery from the criminal case with plaintiffs could infringe on his right to a fair trial. However, the Ohio Attorney General notes that lawyers for Jones and Dowling have said they would oppose the stay on the depositions. 

In other words, it appears the state is trying to block something lawyers for Jones and Dowling think might be helpful to their civil or criminal cases — or both. 

“The State of Ohio has an interest in ensuring that Jones and Dowling do not ‘expand rights of criminal discovery beyond the limits’” of what they could otherwise get, the state’s filing said. Criminal lawyers can generally try to talk with the state’s witnesses, but those people generally can’t be compelled to answer under oath before trial, which would be the case for the depositions.

FirstEnergy spokesperson Jennifer Young declined to comment on the litigation. The company still has not turned over its internal investigation report to plaintiffs in the same litigation, despite a trial court order earlier this year directing them to do so. Briefing before the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on that issue wrapped up last month.

SEC settles with FirstEnergy but sues ex-CEO

Jones is also a defendant in a civil securities fraud case filed last month by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Separately, the SEC also agreed to a $100 million settlement with FirstEnergy. The charges and settlement with the company and the complaint against Jones were both announced September 12.
 
Among other things, the SEC’s investigation found FirstEnergy and its former CEO Chuck Jones made misrepresentations to investors about the company’s role in the alleged HB 6 corruption scheme.
 
FirstEnergy’s securities filings had already noted a reserve of $100 million related to the SEC investigation, so the similar amount is not a surprise. Nonetheless, it drew criticism.
 
“The settlement is disappointingly small, and does little to deter future legislative or regulatory capture by special interests,” said Nolan Rutschilling, managing director of energy policy for the Ohio Environmental Council.
 
The SEC’s order setting forth its charges and the settlement with FirstEnergy notes the company’s consent to its entry is limited to that proceeding. Thus, FirstEnergy’s settlement with federal securities law regulators can’t be used as admissions of liability in the shareholder litigation.
 

Tunnel vision?

Administrative law judges at a PUCO hearing last week granted FirstEnergy’s request to strike parts of testimony by experts for the Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel and IGS Energy. Both parties and others claim the company violated Ohio law requiring corporate separation between utilities and unregulated affiliates.
 
The PUCO had already split off HB 6-related issues for an undetermined future review. But FirstEnergy objected to any mention of HB 6 and to any mention of former PUCO chair Sam Randazzo, even incidentally to matters before passage of the 2019 law.
 
“Such scope expansion would risk confusing the issues and result in a series of proceedings in which the same conduct is addressed more than once,” company lawyers wrote.
 
Letting FirstEnergy “hide the ball” does not mesh with the company’s public claims that its core values include integrity, openness and trust, the Consumers’ Counsel’s October 4 filing said in response. “And it will not aid in dispelling the black cloud that remains over the PUCO concerning its involvement in the HB 6 scandal,” it added.
 
“For consumers, the whole truth about HB 6 needs to come out sooner rather than later,” said Maureen Willis, the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel.
 
Among other things, Joseph Buckley’s written testimony for the Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel argued FirstEnergy should pay penalties of nearly $53.3 million for violations of Ohio rules and an inadequate plan to maintain corporate separation. He calculated the proposed forfeiture at $25,000 per day from January 1, 2016 through November 21, 2021. That did not include any violations related to HB 6 itself, he said.
 
The PUCO’s website lists the corporate separation case as one of four HB 6-related cases. Earlier this year, other parties wanted all four cases consolidated, while FirstEnergy wanted three cases joined and the corporate separation case split off.
 
Randazzo helmed the PUCO when it began the piecemeal approach to issues related to HB 6. Two months later, he resigned after being implicated in the scandal. The PUCO, now chaired by Jenifer French, continued the same approach.
 
Two cases were consolidated in June, but the other two remain separate, with the corporate separation case being further split up.
 

Audit says customers didn’t pay for HB 6

Although FirstEnergy spent roughly $75 million on HB 6 efforts and associated lobbying, the company only allocated about $5 million to its Ohio utilities, a September 30 audit report by the accounting firm Marcum found. Most of that related to a $4.3 million payment to Randazzo shortly before Gov. Mike DeWine appointed him as PUCO chair. FirstEnergy previously admitted that payment was meant to secure Randazzo’s help on HB 6 and other matters.
 
However, the Marcum report said, customer charges for some of those accounts maxed out at a certain point. So, utility customers only paid about $15,000 more than they otherwise would have been charged, it concluded. 
 
“We already agreed to refund this amount, with interest,” said Young at FirstEnergy, noting the new audit results are consistent with a previous report for a capital investment rider. She also noted efforts the company has made since 2021 to strengthen ethics and accountability.
 
On one hand, the report’s findings appear positive: Although FirstEnergy spent millions for activity it admitted was corrupt, most was not charged to ratepayer accounts.
 
Yet the audit still documented improper charges to Ohio utility accounts. And it confirmed FirstEnergy did only a limited review before its assertion in 2020 that ratepayer funds were not used for HB 6.
 
Also, charges to utility accounts aren’t necessarily the same as spending ratepayer money. The audit team could not say how money put into a joint money pool was spent. That especially matters for a credit support rider the company collected about $450 million for, but which the Ohio Supreme Court ultimately held unlawful.
 
The audit team also didn’t review all depositions from HB 6-related shareholder litigation, some of which are subject to a protective order. Multiple witnesses also have not yet answered questions under oath in that litigation and in some of the HB 6 regulatory cases.
 
The audit also didn’t address amounts related to Cleveland-area entrepreneur Tony George, who helped set up a meeting between FirstEnergy leaders and former Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder. Nor did the audit include amounts FirstEnergy steered to dark money groups that supported Gov. Mike DeWine, Lt. Gov. Jon Husted, Ohio Senate President Matt Huffman, Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose and others.  
 
Comments on the audit report must be filed with the PUCO by October 22. Any replies are due November 5.
 

FirstEnergy fought for a federal bailout

Although Donald Trump’s presidential administration pushed for a massive bailout for coal and nuclear power plants, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ultimately rejected that bailout. But it wasn’t for lack of trying by FirstEnergy, a new report by the Energy and Policy Institute shows.
 
While much of the information in the report was previously known, various documents and details have only become public after Trump left office in 2020. He is the Republican nominee in this fall’s presidential election.
 
“The internal FirstEnergy records released this year after years of delays describe in shocking detail the lengths FirstEnergy went to as the utility lobbied for this bailout,” said Dave Anderson, author of the report. The issue is especially relevant now that Trump has made a campaign promise to slash energy prices in half, Anderson said.
 
The report tells about meetings and other communications between FirstEnergy executives and Trump, former Vice President Mike Pence, and others. It also notes that in 2017, FirstEnergy gave $5 million to America First Policies, a pro-Trump dark money group. That same year, FirstEnergy also hired a lobbying firm founded by Trump’s former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski. Lewandowski has denied working for FirstEnergy.
 

Congressional campaign attacks Team Householder candidate

U.S. House Rep. Marcy Kaptur has made HB 6 a campaign issue in ads attacking Republican challenger Derek Merrin. Merrin is finishing his fourth term in the Ohio House of Representatives. He voted for HB 6 in 2019.
 
Merrin also was among the “Team Householder” candidates listed on a government exhibit introduced last year at the criminal trial of former Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder. The government claimed Householder directed the use of dark money funds to help candidates whom he expected to support his bid to become speaker and then to pass a bailout for FirstEnergy.
 
One of Kaptur’s ads said Merrin increased Ohioans’ electric bills. Ohioans have paid more than a third of a billion dollars for HB 6’s coal plant subsidies so far. A separate ad noted Householder and his co-defendant Matt Borges went to prison but said Merrin “kept their money — nearly $20,000.”
 
Kaptur campaign spokesperson Josh Strassberger pointed to a 2024 Daily Beast article saying Merrin received a total of more than $17,000 from Householder’s campaign committee and from one of the dark money groups involved in the HB 6 corruption scandal. Strassberger also referenced campaign donation and spending records adding up to those amounts.
 
Energy News Network reached out multiple times to Merrin’s campaign office but has not received a response.
 
Merrin was not under a legal obligation to return funding from the dark money group or Householder’s campaign. Nor have any criminal allegations been made against him relating to HB 6.
 

Criminal cases continue

Householder was forced out of the Ohio House of Representatives in mid-2021, nearly a year after his arrest on the federal criminal charges. Yet the Friends of Larry Householder campaign committee is still active, with disbursements through early this year.
 
State records reflect multiple payments through last fall to the Pullins Law Firm as payments or retainers for legal services. Approximately $70,000 of that amount was paid out after Householder went to prison last year.
 
Lawyer Scott Pullins told the Columbus Dispatch, which uncovered the payments, that he represents Householder in two cases before the Ohio Elections Commission, as well as a civil lawsuit.
 
Pullins told the Energy News Network he had no further comment, adding that various questions dealt with privileged and confidential matters. Among other things, the Energy News Network asked what share of charges was for the civil lawsuit. Pullins’ appearance in the case was filed in August 2024, after other lawyers for Householder and the campaign committee had filed a motion that could end the case.

Refurbished Three Mile Island Payment
Structure Is Not Quite What It Seems

Steve Hanley

Two weeks ago, the news was filled with reports that Reactor 1 at the
Three Mile Island nuclear generating station, which was shut down in
2019, will be refurbished and put back into service for another 20 years or
more. Its sole customer will be Microsoft, which needs a lot of electricity
to  operate its data centers . Reactor 2 is the one that melted down in 1979.
It is in the process of being dismantled.
The Three Mile Island facility is currently owned by  Constellation
Energy,  the largest operator of nuclear power plants in America. It told

the  New York Times  it plans to spend $1.6 billion to refurbish Reactor 1
and restart it by 2028, pending regulatory approval. “The symbolism is
enormous,” said Joseph Dominguez, chief executive of Constellation. “This
was the site of the industry’s greatest failure, and now it can be a place of
rebirth.”

Economic Benefits Of Three Mile Island

Local residents and politicians welcome the return of Three Mile Island,
which will employ about 600 people when it restarts. “This will transform
the local economy and presents a rare opportunity to power our economy
with reliable clean energy that we can count on,” said Tom Mehaffie, a
Republican state representative whose district includes the plant. “This is a
rare and valuable opportunity to invest in clean, carbon-free and
affordable power — on the heels of the hottest year in Earth’s history.” A
recent poll found that 57% of Pennsylvania residents supported reopening
Three Mile Island “as long as it does not include new taxes or increased
electricity rates.”
Dominguez was especially proud to announce that Constellation would
pay to refurbish the Three Mile Island facility entirely out of its own
pocket, and Microsoft would be on the hook for buying electricity from the
plant for 20 years. “We’re not asking for a penny from the state or from
utility customers,” he said.
There is a lot to unpack here. The demand for electricity is exploding,
thanks to cryptomining and AI.  Data centers  are sucking up vast amounts
of electricity, much of it from renewables. That means there is precious
little electricity left over to cool our homes and business, power our
electric cars, or meet the needs of industries trying to decarbonize their
activities. Supplying the crypto and AI sectors with renewable energy
threatens to slow or reverse the transition to clean energy for the rest of
society. At some point, we may need to ask ourselves just how much
crypto and AI we really need.

A $1.6 Billion Federal Loan Guarantee

What Joseph Dominguez failed to mention when he proclaimed that
Constellation was not asking for a penny from the state or from utility
customers to restart Three Mile Island was that in May it applied for a $1.6
billion federal loan guarantee — which coincidentally is precisely the
amount of money it plans to invest to restart the shuttered reactor.
According to the  Washington Post , the taxpayer-backed loan could give
Microsoft and Constellation Energy a major boost in their unprecedented
bid to steer all the power from a US nuclear plant to a single company.
Microsoft is one of many large tech companies scouring the nation for
zero emissions power for its data centers and one of the leaders in the
field of artificial intelligence.
The plan to restart the shuttered reactor on Three Mile Island has already
generated controversy as energy experts debate the merits of providing
separate federal subsidies for the project in the form of tax credits.
Constellation’s pursuit of the $1.6 billion federal loan guarantee, which
has not been previously disclosed, is likely to intensify that debate. The
loan guarantee request has cleared an initial review. It has now reached
the stage where the specific terms of a deal would ordinarily start to be
negotiated, according to the Washington Post. A loan guarantee would
allow Constellation to shift much of the risk of reopening Three Mile Island
to taxpayers. The federal government, in this case, would pledge to cover
up to $1.6 billion if there is a default. The guarantees are typically used by
developers to lower the cost of project financing, as lenders are willing to
offer more favorable terms when there is federal backing.
Borrowing Costs For Three Mile Island

In this case, the loan guarantee could save Constellation up to $122
million in borrowing costs for restarting Three Mile Island, John Parsons,
an energy economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told
the Post. It would come on top of the federal tax credits on the sale of the
power — passed in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 — which could be
worth nearly $200 million annually for Constellation and Microsoft. Over
20 years, that comes to a tidy sum — $4 billion to be exact. Technology
companies already benefit from similar tax credits when they purchase
energy from a solar or wind farm, but nuclear power plants generate

electricity at a higher cost, making the scale of the subsidy larger.
Microsoft and Constellation have not released any details about how
much the electricity from Three Mile Island will cost.
The Energy Department declined to comment on the application, but
Constellation  told the Post it has not decided whether to accept the loan
guarantee if one is offered, but claimed that any financial risk for
taxpayers would be negligible. “Rest assured that to the extent we may
seek a loan, Constellation will guarantee full repayment,” said a statement
from the company. “Any notion that taxpayers are taking on risk here is
fanciful given that any loan will be backstopped by Constellation’s entire
$80-billion-plus value.” If that is so, then why the need for the federal loan
guarantee in the first place?
The biggest risk to taxpayers would be if the project were to fail after a
significant amount of money is spent trying to get Three Mile Island
operational. Such setbacks are common when new nuclear plants are
being built. The last new nuclear reactors to go online near Augusta,
Georgia, were seven years late and  $17 billion over budget . Constellation
says it is confident Three Mile Island won’t face such setbacks because the
company is restarting an existing unit rather than building a new one from
the ground up. Some may view that as wishful thinking, or as my old Irish
grandmother liked to say, “There’s many a slip twixt the cup and the lip.”
Proponents say reopening nuclear power plants is a good option,
especially with increased demand from data centers that are being built
across the country. “We want Microsoft to buy their electricity from zero-
carbon energy sources instead of from coal plants, so it is in the interest
of all of us that this nuclear power plant gets reopened,” John Parsons said
of the Three Mile Island plan. While the loan guarantee does have risks,
the reopening of an existing nuclear plant is far less likely to run into the
massive cost overruns and delays that are common with the construction
of a new nuclear plant, he added.

Another Kink In The Program

To hear Microsoft and Constellation tell it, every electron generated by the
rejuvenated Three Mile Island plant would be used to power Microsoft

data centers. That’s not quite how it will work out in practice, however.
The electricity from the restarted nuclear reactor will not be connected
directly to Microsoft’s data centers. Instead it will flow into the broader
power grid that serves 13 states and D.C. As the purchaser of the clean
energy, Microsoft can use it to erase — on paper — the emissions from
burning gas or coal to produce electricity that does flow into its data
centers. Microsoft is among several large tech firms using such accounting
methods to brand their data centers climate
friendly. CleanTechnica readers are savvy enough to recognize there is
great potential for all of this euphoria over Three Mile island to become
little more than another corporate greenwashing scheme, one paid for in
large part by federal taxpayers.
Some critics question if Constellation is presenting an overly optimistic
assessment of how quickly and cheaply a nuclear plant can be restarted.
The company said last month that $1.6 billion would cover the full cost of
reopening Three Mile Island by 2028. “We have one Big Tech company
trying to do something that is not aligned with how the markets should be
working, and they want to do it on the backs of ratepayers and taxpayers,”
said Evan Caron, co-founder of Montauk Climate, which invests in clean
energy technologies.
If there are any cost overruns or delays, Microsoft would probably have
the option of abandoning the deal and Constellation would need to find
another buyer willing to pay a premium for Three Mile Island power, he
said. “This has real risk. I think the likelihood of that plant coming back
online by 2028 is low to zero,” Caron said. Constellation bristles at the
suggestion. “We know every inch of this plant and what needs to be done,”
the company said in a statement. “To be clear, Constellation will restart
[Three Mile Island] in 2028, and in fact, we will aim to restart it a year
earlier.”

The Takeaway

There is nothing overtly wrong with the plan to restart Three Mile Island,
but when the details are examined, there certainly are some reasons to be

skeptical. First, when the company bragged it was putting its own money
unto the project, it should have been upfront about the federal loan
guarantee. Second, when Microsoft bragged it was increasing the supply
of renewable energy to its data centers, it should have been upfront about
how the process will actually work. In point of fact, none of the electricity
from Three Mile Island may ever be used to power a Microsoft data
center. There are carbon offsets and accounting shenanigans at work
here, which open the door to chicanery or what some might call “creative
accounting.”
At worst, both companies may have committed sins of omissions, little
white lies that take some of the luster off their bold plan to restart Three
Mile Island. Back in the George W. Bush era, this would be known as
“sideways waffling.” Both companies should know better than to tell part
of the story instead of the entire story. Shame on Microsoft and
Constellation for being a little less than completely honest about what
their plan entails. Being coy about such details make people wonder what
else they are hiding.

Pages