
NUCLEAR INFORMATION AND RESOURCE SERVICE
6930 Carroll Avenue, Suite 340, Takoma Park, MD 20912
301-270-NIRS (301-270-6477); Fax: 301-270-4291
nirsnet@nirs.org; www.nirs.org
 
NEWS FROM NIRS
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE        
April 10, 2013
Contact: Michael Mariotte, Executive Director                                                               
301-270-6477; 301-325-8014 (mobile)
GAO REPORT FINDS NRC DOES NOT UNDERSTAND, NOR DO ITS REGS  ADEQUATELY CONSIDER, “SHADOW EVACUATION” PHENOMENON AT NUCLEAR REACTOR  SITES
But report misses another key issue: Americans will want to be  protected from radiation-induced cancer and disease, not just acute  effects
 
The U.S. Government Accountability Office today released a report  finding that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission does not adequately  understand the “shadow evacuation” phenomenon at nuclear reactors, and  that its emergency planning regulations do not adequately account for  the strong likelihood that far more people would evacuate, from much  further distances than NRC plans, in a real nuclear emergency.
“The report did not cover another crucial and little-known flaw in  current U.S. nuclear emergency plans,” said Michael Mariotte, executive  director of Nuclear Information and Resource Service, “which is that  they are designed to protect only against very high levels of radiation  exposure capable of causing immediate health effects, and would not  prevent large-scale exposure to radiation levels that would cause  chronic illness, including cancer.”
“It’s past time for the NRC to strengthen its emergency rules—that’s a  clear lesson from the Fukushima and Chernobyl nuclear disasters, both  of which resulted in evacuations far beyond the NRC’s current 10-mile  zone,” said Mariotte. “In a real radiation release, the American people  will expect the government to act to protect them against exposures that  could cause damaging health effects. This is especially important since  the NRC’s current antiquated rules are based on exposure effects to an  average adult man—yet women and children are far more susceptible to  radiation than men.”
“But to make matters worse,” Mariotte added, “the EPA last week  proposed radiation “clean-up” standards that could force Americans to  live in highly-contaminated areas and ingest highly-contaminated food  and water in the aftermath of a nuclear power accident or radiological  attack. These standards would codify cancer and are completely at odds  with civilized society. They must not be allowed to take effect.”
The GAO report mirrors one criticism of NRC emergency planning  included in a Petition for Rulemaking submitted by NIRS last February,  to expand the size of the current 10-mile Emergency Planning Zones  around U.S. reactors to 25 miles and to make other planning and training  improvements. That Petition, backed by some 6,000 organizations and  individuals, is still pending at the NRC.
The GAO warned that by failing to account and plan for the actual  numbers of people who would evacuate in a nuclear emergency, “NRC may  not be providing the best planning guidance to licensees and state and  local authorities.”
The “shadow evacuation” phenomenon was demonstrated at the 1979 Three  Mile Island accident, where some 5,000 pregnant women and children  under five within five miles of the site were advised to evacuate. But  well over 100,000 people from 25 and more miles away actually fled.
The GAO conducted the report at the request of four U.S. Senators,  Democrats Barbara Boxer of California, Robert P. Casey Jr. of  Pennsylvania, Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island and independent Bernard  Sanders of Vermont, in the wake of a 2011 investigative series from  Associated Press showing startling population increases near many  nuclear reactors and a population outside the immediate 10-mile  Emergency Planning Zones largely unaware of what to do in the event of a  nuclear accident.
The GAO report is available here: http://www.gao.gov/prerelease/files/0G94_d13243.pdf
The NIRS Petition for Rulemaking is available here: http://www.nirs.org/reactorwatch/emergency/petitionforrulemaking22012.pdf
In September 2012, NIRS’ executive director Michael Mariotte  testified before the NRC on emergency planning shortcomings, including  the failure to protect against chronic health effects: http://www.nirs.org/reactorwatch/emergency/mmnrcepz911312.htm
More background information on nuclear emergency planning issues can be found on NIRS’ Nuclear 911 webpage here: http://www.nirs.org/reactorwatch/emergency/emergencyhome.htm