Jonesborough, Tennessee, Has a Uranium Problem

A promise of jobs and economic development is not enough to convince people of rural Jonesborough, Tennessee, that a depleted uranium facility is worth the potential risks. They want more safety checks.

by Marina WatersJune 25, 2026

An aerial view of the BWX Technologies plant in Erwin, Tennessee. (Photo from BWXT)

The moment Susanne Fort saw Little Limestone Creek, which makes its way through her property and much of rural Jonesborough, Tennessee, she knew she had found her home. That was in 2010. Now, when she gazes upon the creek’s clear, ever-moving stream, she’s unsure of its future and her own.

“It took me seven years of searching to find this house,” Fort said. “We knew it was a fixer-upper. It’s pre-Civil War, so we were expecting that. Then we walked down and looked at the property — the creek — and we were just sold. It is incredibly beautiful.”

Fort lives about a mile downstream from BWX Technologies, Inc., a nuclear technology, manufacturing, and services company that acquired its Jonesborough site in 2025. BWXT looks to build a new, high-purity depleted uranium (HPDU) manufacturing facility adjacent to its current site. The new facility will help fulfill the company’s 10-year contract valued at $1.6 billion to provide the federal government with HPDU used for national defense technology. According to the company’s website, the company is the federal government’s only U.S. supplier of HPDU. Under the contract, BWXT will create up to 300 metric tons of the material annually.

It’s also created concern in residents.

The Land

Jonesborough is Tennessee’s oldest town, known for its annual National Storytelling Festival in its charming historic downtown. It’s surrounded by views of a green Buffalo Mountain and Cherokee National Forest in the heart of what’s historically been an agriculturally rich area. 

“They say it’s like a hallmark town,” Fort said. “This whole area is kind of like a hallmark area. The history, the houses, the people who’ve been here a long time — it’s just breathtaking. It’s just a really nice place, up to this point.”

Jonesborough meets rural Telford, Tennessee, on Old State Route 34, which is home to rolling pasture land, Little Limestone Creek, and numerous farms and homes spread throughout the East Tennessee hills — along with David Crockett High School, all situated on the rural two-lane road.

“I don’t love the idea of hazardous material transport by this high school, by these farms, with these roundabouts,” said Anna Wright, who lives near the newly rezoned property. “I live a mile from there. If there is an accident with hazardous material transport, that affects a lot of people.”

“There are going to be semis going in and out all the time,” Fort said. “This road can’t handle that. I drive a truck. It’s barely wide enough for a normal truck.”

BWXT expects about one hazardous material truck trip per day with reagents and oxide feedstock coming in and HPDU metal and solidified waste going out, according to the company’s website dedicated to the Jonesborough facility. The company also states it expects about four hazardous-material shipments and non-hazardous deliveries per operating day when the site is fully operational.

To prepare for the shipments, the company looks for a road-widening project to commence via the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT).

“TDOT is beginning development of a State Industrial Access (SIA) roadway improvement project along Old State Route 34 (SR 353) to help serve the needs of BWXT,” Mark Nagi, the regional communications officer for TDOT in East Tennessee, said in an email. 

“The project is very preliminary at this point as we are coordinating with BWXT about their long-range plans for the site, and how they plan to connect to SR 353. This information will help inform the design of the roadway project. At this time, we do not have a schedule or budget developed for the roadway improvements.”

On March 23, 2026, the Washington County Commission approved BWXT’s rezoning request to change its 56-acre property on Old State Route 34 from an agricultural/agricultural business and residential zoning to one suited for high-impact industry.

Hundreds of residents in neon shirts filled the meeting space and two overflow rooms during the commission’s March 23 meeting. A line of residents ready to address the commission in opposition of the rezoning snaked through the room and into the hallway. The community gathered a petition with over 10,000 signatures in opposition. Still the Washington County Commission voted 10-5 to approve the rezoning.

“There’s a risk in life,” Washington County Commissioner Kenneth Huffine said at the March 23 meeting. “I think every time we get in our automobiles we accept more risk every day. What is the risk of doing something? What’s the risk of not doing something?”

The Water and Air

Fort is one of the many residents who has a small family farm in the surrounding area. She worries her animals and those nearby could be at risk.

“Our animals are grazing here,” Fort said. “This impacts our hayfields, our wildlife. We have a lot of hunters. Some families depend on that for a food source. How are you going to support your farmer if the cattle has been drinking from this creek that now has uranium dust in it?”

Fort and other community members are also concerned for local waterways.

“It’s a site that has a flood plain and a very important water source within it,” Anna Wright said. “It requires more vigilance to make sure we have clean drinking water, soil and air…Even in the absence of an accident, it’s still so close to our water table. It’s so close to homes and farms.”

John Dobken, BWXT’s senior manager of media and public relations, told the Daily Yonder the project will not impact Little Limestone Creek. Plans include bridges that would go over the waterway.

According to the company, the HPDU process includes “redundant barriers and safeguards” to prevent contamination of ground and surface water.

“These protections are based on source elimination, engineered containment and system segregation, rather than reliance on monitoring or cleanup after the fact,” stated one of the company’s online responses to community questions.

The property also includes a floodplain, which, residents, such as Gabriel Wilson, who spoke at the March 23 meeting, cite as a concern. In 2024, flooding from Hurricane Helene ravaged southern Washington County, washing away homes, farms, roads, and bridges — all just six miles from BWXT’s Old State Route property.

“You’re voting to put it inches from the floodplain after Helene,” Wilson said, “where our whole community has been traumatized.”

According to the company, the project will keep all facilities outside of the mapped flood zones. Dobken said plans also include a retaining wall above the flood zone to prevent flooding to the site.

“We are putting in retaining walls that will actually enhance the floodplain,” Dobken said, “and make it even more difficult for any flooding to occur. (Increased flooding) would be an extremely remote situation.”

As for emissions from the site, documents show the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation deemed BWXT’s future facility process an “insignificant activity or insignificant emissions unit.” The documents state the facility would release less than five tons of each contaminant and each regulated air pollutant “that is not a hazardous air pollutant,” and less than 1,000 pounds per year of each hazardous air pollutant.

Dobken said the company will release a much smaller amount of emissions.

“Even if all of the things we put in place failed, we would still only be putting out 250 pounds a year, which would be much less than the hazardous threshold,” Dobken said. “We’re not putting out anywhere near 250 pounds of uranium particulates. It’s going to be in the order of grams. I think a lot of people saw that number and thought that was what was going out.”

Luke Carter is a longtime resident who lives about seven miles from the newly rezoned site. For Carter, his concern remains in the overall increased risk.

“Things happen. There is a risk. They admit there is a risk,” Carter said. “You increase operations, you increase risks. We don’t want to increase risks. And we don’t want to put it closer to Little Limestone Creek, closer to the groundwater, closer to the watershed. It’s not good.”

Wright hopes to see real-time information related to any hazards the community should be aware of.

“I would feel a lot better, and I would love for BWXT to consider independent, third-party, in-real-time analysis opportunities for the community to have access to,” Wright said. “The people who live here deserve to find out in real time what’s happening with their water, air, and soil. They don’t deserve to find out five years or 10 years later when people get sick.”

The Effects

Along with material for national defense, BWXT plans to bring jobs and economic support to Jonesborough.

The company is slated to add $176 million annually to Washington County’s gross domestic product, according to Alicia Summers, the county’s economic development council executive director. Summers said BWXT’s expansion includes 181 new jobs with an average wage of $55 an hour. The projected capital investment from the company is over $714 million in investments over a five-year period.

“It’s a generational opportunity for us at a time of a very uncertain economy,” Huffine said before voting in favor of the rezoning. “That’s a factor for us to consider.” Fort and other residents, however, believe it will have a negative impact on the area.“They’re saying it’s all about income it’s going to bring in,” Fort said. “I disagree. I think that’s going to kill this area once the word gets out and people find out what they’ve got down the road.”

Concern for the future also brought the community together for a cause that continues. What started as a “Neighbors of BWXT” Facebook group has morphed into the non-profit, the East Tennessee Community Coalition. The group has retained Attorney Matt Grossman of Knoxville and aims to raise money for a legal fund while also spreading community awareness.

“It’s been about community interest,” Carter said. “It’s been about people over politics and representing the interest of local people and local control instead of state and federal. It’s not about Republicans and Democrats.”

Little Limestone Creek stretches about six miles from BWXT until it meets the Nolichucky River, the nearby body of water that saw massive flooding from Hurricane Helene. Fort believes it’s also important for those downstream from the site to be aware of the new facility.

“We’ve been educating and reaching out,” Fort said. “It’s a lot of people to try to reach. That’s our goal, to just educate everybody in East Tennessee.”

Members are also busy testing the soil and the water — an action the community looks to make a regular occurrence.

“We have an opportunity to do our own independent testing,” Wright said. “If that’s not something they’re willing to do, I think as a service to the community, we need to make sure we’re doing it.”

For some, the information gathered will dictate if they leave or stay in the region.

“I can’t in good conscience live here unless I have clear answers,” Wright said. “At the end of the day, I’m not going to live in an unsafe place. I’m not going to raise my kids where I can’t trust the air a mile away. That’s too much for me to bear.”

“It’s one thing to move because you decided to, your job took you somewhere else or there’s another community you feel would be a great fit for your family. It’s another thing to have to execute your plan b, feeling like you’re being evicted from your own home, your farm and your dream.”

Fort is also contemplating her future.

“This will determine if we stay here or not,” Fort said. “It’s something my husband and I have been thinking about. We absolutely do not want to move. We love it here, but I don’t know. They are playing with a lot of people’s lives. It’s not fair. If our kids were small still, we’d already be gone.”

They also say the fight isn’t over.

“We are going to go down having done everything we possibly could if we’re going to go down,” Wright said. “I think the community isn’t going to be quiet.”


Marina Waters is a journalist from East Tennessee with an affinity for stories throughout Southern Appalachia. She has covered everything from breaking national news to deep dives on bitcoin mining in rural Tennessee. Her work has appeared in various publications, including the New York Times.


Not surprised one bit! They were caught bribing officials a few years ago too. 
 
Ted

https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/doc-comment#other 

Documents for Comment

subscribe to page updates
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) affords the public opportunities to comment on proposed rules and policies, licensing actions, and draft technical documents. Toward that end, the NRC announces public comment opportunities in the Federal Register, here on the Documents for Comment page, and sometimes through press releases, and places all public comments into the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) and into a docket for the action on regulations.gov.
 
For tips on how to submit effective comments, go to regulations.gov, search by Docket ID number for the document you would like to comment on, and select "Comment Now," then select "View Commenter's Checklist (PDF)."
 
The following types of documents are available for comment:
 
Some of the links on this page are to non-NRC servers and websites and are provided solely as a reference for the convenience of users. NRC cannot guarantee the authenticity of documents or the validity of information obtained at these non-NRC websites. See our Site Disclaimer for more information.

Rulemaking-Related Documents

The NRC began managing rulemaking-related actions on the Government-wide Regulations.gov Web site in January 2008. The public can submit comments on NRC rulemaking actions through that site; see Navigating Rulemaking-Related Documents.

FRN Publication Date Docket ID Title Comment Period
Close Date
05/29/2026 OMB-2026-0034 Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance  07/13/2026
05/18/2026 NRC-2025-1205 Modernizing NRC Regulations for Byproduct Material Use 07/02/2026

License Applications/Amendments

The following table lists notices of license applications received by the NRC and proposed amendments to NRC-licensed facility operations available for comment. For information regarding opportunities for public involvement in these licensing actions, see Hearing Opportunities and License Applications.

FRN Publication Date Docket ID Title Comment Period
Close Date
06/24/2026 NRC-2026-2774 Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Holtec Pilgrim, LLC; Holtec Indian Point 2, LLC; Holtec Indian Point 3, LLC; Oyster Creek Environmental Protection, LLC; Holtec Big Rock Point, LLC; Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Indian Point Nuclear Generating Stations 1, 2, and 3; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Big Rock Point; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Licenses 07/24/2026
06/23/2026 NRC-2026-3103 Biweekly Notice;
Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations
07/23/2026
06/18/2026 NRC-2026-3070 Vistra Operations Company LLC; Energy Harbor Nuclear Generation LLC;
Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1; License Amendment Request
07/20/2026
06/16/2026 NRC-2026-2707 EnergySolutions, LLC and Bridgepoint Group PLC;
Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Licenses
07/16/2026
06/16/2026 NRC-2026-2411 Applications for Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination and Containing Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Order Imposing Procedures for Access to Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information 07/16/2026
06/16/2026 NRC-2026-2344 Nebraska Public Power District;
Cooper Nuclear Station
Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement;
07/06/2026
06/15/2026 NRC-2026-0265 Palisades SMR, LLC; 
Palisades Energy Center; Pioneer Units 1 and 2;
Phased Construction Permit Application; Limited Work Authorization; Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
07/15/2026
06/11/2026 NRC-2026-2906 Orano Enrichment USA LLC; Uranium Enrichment Facility;
Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and 
Prepare Environmental Impact Statement
07/13/2026
06/09/2026 NRC-2026-2740 Biweekly Notice;
Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations
07/09/2026
06/08/2026 NRC-2026-0397 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC;
Christopher M. Crane Clean Energy Center;
Draft Environmental Assessment and Draft Finding of No Significant Impact
07/08/2026
06/04/2026 NRC-2026-2575 Arizona Public Service Company;
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Licenses
07/06/2026
04/29/2026 NRC-2021-0082 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC.;
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1.;
Subsequent License Renewal Application
06/29/2026
05/26/2026 NRC-2026-2410 Biweekly Notice;
Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations
06/26/2026

Generic Communications

The following Generic Communications documents have been issued for public comment and noticed in the Federal Register.

FRN Publication Date Docket ID Title Comment Period
Close Date
There is no content at this time.

Draft Regulatory Guides

The NRC issues regulatory guides in draft form to solicit public comment and involve the public in developing the agency's regulatory positions. Draft regulatory guides have not received complete staff review and, therefore, they do not represent official NRC staff positions.

 

FRN Publication Date Docket ID Title Comment Period
Close Date
06/04/2026 NRC-2025-0677 Direct Final Regulatory Guide:  Acceptability of ASME OM-2 Code, Component Testing Requirements at Nuclear Facilities 07/06/2026
06/02/2026 NRC-2026-0826 Draft Regulatory Guide:  Application and Testing of Safety-Related Diesel Generators in Nuclear Power Plants  07/02/2026

Draft NUREG-Series Publications

The following NUREG-series documents have been issued for public comment and noticed in the Federal Register.

FRN Publication Date Docket ID Title Comment Period
Close Date
There is no content at this time.

Policy Statements

The following policy statements have been issued for public comment and noticed in the Federal Register.

FRN Publication Date Docket ID Title Comment Period
Close Date
There is no content at this time.

Draft Interim Staff Guidance

Interim Staff Guidance documents are issued to clarify or to address issues not discussed in a Standard Review Plan.

FRN Publication Date Docket ID Title Comment Period
Close Date
There is no content at this time.

Information Collections

The following information collections have been issued for public comment and noticed in the Federal Register.

FRN Publication Date Docket ID Title Comment Period
Close Date
06/24/2026 NRC-2026-0364 Information Collection:  NRC Form 536 Operator Licensing Examination Data 08/24/2026
05/21/2026 NRC-2025-1600 Information Collection:  Suspicious Activity Reporting Using the Protective Web Server 07/20/2026
05/14/2026 NRC-2026-0430 Information Collection:  Notice of Enforcement Discretion (NOEDs) for Operating Power Reactors and Gaseous Diffusion Plants (GDP), NRC Enforcement Policy 07/13/2026
05/14/2026 NRC-2026-0067 Information Collection:  NRC Form 974, Privacy Act Compliant Form 07/13/2026
05/14/2026 NRC-2025-1567 Information Collection:  NUREG/BR-0254, Payment Methods and NRC Form 629, Authorization for Payment by Credit Card 07/13/2026
05/14/2026 NRC-2025-1534 Information Collection:  Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Educational Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance 07/13/2026

Other Documents for Comment

The following technical documents have been issued for public comment and noticed in the Federal Register.

FRN Publication Date Docket ID Title Comment Period
Close Date
05/20/2026 NRC-2026-1453 Level 3 Probabilistic Risk Assessment Project Documentation (Volume 1) 07/20/2026

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, June 24, 2026

Europe's heatwave curbs French nuclear plants

By  and 

Cooling towers of the Golfech nuclear plant

View from a car window of steam rising from a cooling tower of the Electricite de France (EDF) nuclear power plant in Golfech, France, February 16, 2025. REUTERS/Manon Cruz Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

June 24 (Reuters) - A heatwave sweeping western Europe reduced France's nuclear output on Wednesday as high temperatures across the country reduced access to water needed to cool ​reactors.

Output was reduced by 4.1 gigawatts, or 7%, of total power demand at midday, data from French ‌utility EDF showed.

The Reuters Power Up newsletter provides everything you need to know about the global energy industry. Sign up here.

Temperatures have topped 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit) in some places in France, which, combined with reduced wind speeds, has boosted wholesale electricity prices.

Wholesale spot power prices in France and Germany on Tuesday reached their highest level since mid-January 2025 as electricity systems grappled ​with the heat and relied on gas generation.

France is also usually a large net exporter of cheap electricity ​to neighbouring countries, but as the temperatures have risen exports have dropped, data from grid ⁠operator RTE showed.

Exports from France dropped to around 3 GW during the afternoon on Wednesday compared to 10 GW to ​12 GW recorded last week at the same time, reducing the cheap supply for neighbours and cutting into profits from ​transmission.

"Climate change is demonstrating how extreme heat can be as disruptive as the (price spikes from cold weather and low renewables) witnessed during winter," Kpler analyst Alessandro Armenia said.

"We are surprised now, but we should expect next summer to exhibit similar dynamics, as climate change is undeniable," ​he said.

The heat has reduced output at the Saint-Alban 2 and Bugey 3 reactors on the Rhone river in ​eastern France, and the Nogent 2 reactor on the Seine southeast of Paris.

The Golfech 2 reactor on the Garonne river in southwest France ‌went ⁠offline late Monday due to the heat.

French environmental regulations force nuclear operator EDF to reduce output when river temperatures reach a certain threshold to protect local ecosystems.

It was not certain how long the current heatwave, driven by a weather pattern known as an Omega block due to its shape, which allows temperatures to build day after day, would last.

Europe is ​warming at more than twice the ​global average, the World Meteorological ⁠Organisation has said, which makes prolonged heat episodes increasingly likely.

The European power system is increasingly reliant on renewable power generation, where the evening drop in solar power is replaced by ​wind and baseload power from nuclear, coal and gas, driving up prices when the ​sun goes down.

Nearly ⁠all countries have seen an increase in thermal generation, which includes gas and coal, in the evenings, including France where gas-fired generation is usually minimal, Kpler data showed.

This week, the pattern is exacerbated by overall higher cooling demand and below-normal wind generation, ⁠requiring the ​use of more gas-fired power, with the most expensive plants setting the ​wholesale price, LSEG analyst Nathalie Gerl said.

This week is an outlier, however, as the summer has seen regular oversupply on the electricity market, she added.

Reporting ​by Tristan Veyet and Hugo Lhomedet in Gdansk and Forrest Crellin in Paris; editing by Tomasz Janowski and Jason Neely

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Hugo is a French journalist based in Gdansk covering financial markets in France and the Benelux countries.

Trump administration announces $17.5 billion in loans for 10 new large nuclear reactors

https://apnews.com/article/nuclear-reactors-energy-trump-wright-57841139aca7d2780a12256692b96fc5

Eco-Friendly Habits for a Budget-Friendly Green Lifestyle

Crane Crap letters (12) to Federally Recognized Tribes

ML26149A244

NRC Letters to Federally Recognized Tribes - Notice of Issuance of Draft EA and Draft FONSI Regarding the Chri

2026-06-10 09:56 AM EST

N2
MJK

Here is an update on Global Laser Enrichment’s proposed Paducah Laser Enrichment Facility (PLEF), the first-of-its-kind laser uranium enrichment facility in the country. The NRC released the draft EIS and opened a public comment period that closed May 11, 2026. The draft EIS: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2606/ML26061A085.pdf

As I wrote in my CounterPunch article back in April, there are two main issues:

First, the NRC is using NUREG-2249 — a Generic Environmental Impact Statement written for nuclear reactors — as a substitute for site-specific analysis of a laser enrichment facility, a completely different technology that has never operated at commercial scale anywhere. Second, the whole project depends on DOE selling GLE more than 200,000 metric tons of depleted uranium tails stored at the old Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant — and the GAO has twice concluded DOE probably lacks the legal authority to sell it. 

https://www.counterpunch.org/2026/04/06/secrets-and-shortcuts-the-us-uranium-enrichment-rush/


Since then, two parties have submitted requests for hearings, and I’m sharing the status of this. I’m lucky to be in communication with the applicants who are keeping me up-to-date and I thought I’d share it with y’all.

Timeline:

In May, the Kentucky Resources Council (KRC), a public-interest environmental law group, filed a request for a hearing:
https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2612/ML26125A449.pdf

A second petitioner, Michael McVicker, also filed a request for hearing, raising issues including seismic risk and the cumulative impacts of the adjacent General Matter enrichment facility now under development on the same site:
https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2612/ML26122A001.pdf

On June 1, both GLE and the NRC Staff filed answers opposing the petitions. They argue the petitioners lack standing and have no admissible contentions. On the NUREG-2249 issue, they defend an internal staff “crosswalk” — a document with no rulemaking and no public process — as sufficient basis to apply reactor findings to a laser enrichment facility. On the DOE issue, they argue that whether DOE can legally sell the uranium is “outside the scope” of the licensing proceeding — even though the license itself authorizes GLE to receive and possess that exact material.

GLE’s answer:
https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2615/ML26152A287.pdf

NRC Staff’s answer:
https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2615/ML26152A303.pdf

Today, June 8, KRC filed its reply pushing back on all of it, including the NRC’s decision to skip a cumulative impacts analysis entirely by granting itself an exemption from its own regulations.

KRC’s reply should be available on NRC’s Adam’s system soon. I can’t send attachments to the list so if you’re interested in seeing it, let me know and I’ll send it to you.

 

This is an important and developing story because it shows how the NRC is operating in ways that seem completely illegal. If the Board denies the petition — which it most likely will — KRC can appeal to the full Commission, and if that fails, take the case to federal court. 

I plan to write about this after the Board’s decision and will keep you posted. If you have any comments or feedback, please share. Feel free to forward this. 

NRC guts mandatory sufficiency hearings for Reactor Licensing Effective June 8, 2026. No public comment taken.
 

What changed:

• Previously the mandatory hearing came after staff completed its safety and environmental review — as an independent sufficiency check confirming the work was adequate

• It now happens 30 days after docketing — before the safety and environmental review exists

• The Commission delegated its authority to a staff facilitator. No commissioners required

• The sufficiency review is gone. The hearing produces no findings and no binding outcomes

• You can request a contested hearing after the review is complete — which can be dismissed on procedural grounds before it ever reaches the merits
 
The NRC justifies eliminating the sufficiency review by arguing that the original 1957 hearing requirement was a response to the AEC’s dual role promoting and regulating nuclear power — a conflict they claim was resolved when Congress abolished the AEC in 1974 and created the NRC.  That argument is fiction because clearly the NRC is promoting nuclear power every day.
Anticipated capitulation by FERC
Thank you to Roger Harried Micheal Keegan.
 
 

Pages